Ellen Degeneres Videos

Currently Watching: Watching: Response to: atheists have faith, just like theists.

Response to: "Atheists have faith, just like theists." Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 660 seconds Matt Dillahunty responds to the claim that people need as much faith to NOT believe in god, as to believe in god. Credit: Atheist Experience http://www.atheis t-experience.com/ 02/10/08 #539 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: "how can it not be ... By: godverdegodverdomme. on 02 Dec 08, 00:58:07 "how can it not be related to religion if its RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE YOU STUPID GIT" That is like saying the jews were 'intolerant' to hitler's concentration camps. YOU STUPID GIT ! basically all ... By: evilofisalm. on 01 Dec 08, 22:46:35 basically all religion stinks and there fear of people having an open mind scares them{hence this shit} An ideal world is ... By: Ozzyman200. on 01 Dec 08, 13:49:29 An ideal world is certainly a lot further off with the religious nutjobs, their genocides, their thought-police, their delusions. It's dying out now, but there're still a few god-botherers who just won't flush. "the idea of a ... By: damianpoirier. on 01 Dec 08, 13:14:12 "the idea of a utopia is such a fairy tale idea." A beautiful quote from a christian who faith peaches his lord reigning in peace forever. So you agree that life under Jesus would be a totalitarian regime. Interesting. And you follow this tyrant because...? PUNCH YER HEAD FER ... By: Bockatadi. on 01 Dec 08, 08:48:16 PUNCH YER HEAD FER JESUS!! well take your ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 01 Dec 08, 03:54:31 well take your ragging on Christianity and shove it up yours. Seriously you walk right into everything. And the idea of a utopia is such a fairy tale idea. There is no utopia because everybody in this world has a different opinion and is unique, so to try to establish a utopia is a totalitarian movement, especially when it results in the killing of millions. My spiels are obviously too much for you to handle so I'm tossin' you out the window. without converts ... By: damianpoirier. on 30 Nov 08, 20:08:14 without converts the power is nill. Christianity(in fact every religion) diminishes the value of life in favor of some supposed post mortum immortality. Any way you slice it they worship death. Atheist who believe this is the only life seek to maximize life and living for all. So take your stupid fucking ragging on utopia and shove it up your whoziwitz. Well, 1 and 2 were ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 30 Nov 08, 19:52:24 Well, 1 and 2 were alright, until you had to sneak in number 3. It has never been taught that the crusades were fought to win converts. I keep handing the Inquisition to you, but that's all your getting, because it's the only honest killing in the name of God. Now as far as secularists go, they would use the excuse of a SECULAR UTOPIA as justified means for killing millions. Secular Utopia being an atheist philosophy, atheists must be accountable, such as christians for their ancestors. Fair. I never said it ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 30 Nov 08, 19:48:45 I never said it wasn't related to religion, I just said it wasn't the problem. Intolerance is. And really what are you hoping to accomplish with putting things in all caps and calling me a retarded name? Really what is it? That caller is ... By: Beorn86. on 30 Nov 08, 19:18:40 That caller is totally lost, completely relying on circular logic how can it not be ... By: kolzarzor. on 30 Nov 08, 17:42:44 how can it not be related to religion if its RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE YOU STUPID GIT my understanding is ... By: damianpoirier. on 30 Nov 08, 14:31:28 my understanding is that their mission was three fold 1) acquire religious artifacts 2) gain control of the holy lands 3) convert people. Control of the holy land was desired for numerous reasons. Chief among them was artifact claim and control (prevention of damage, theft, etc), prevention of desecration by infidels etc.. And this was for power and control of the talismans that could be used to win and retain and control converts. Religion is such a ... By: Ozzyman200. on 30 Nov 08, 12:52:36 Religion is such a curse on the world. It's left nothing but blood in its wake. Shameful. ok...what do YOU ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 30 Nov 08, 08:28:33 ok...what do YOU think they were fighting over? Your examination is ... By: ItachiRaikiri. on 30 Nov 08, 07:56:42 Your examination is true as far as it goes but it doesn't go far.... Religions act as a trigure and occasion for conflicts I agree that the deeper CAUSES are always economical.... yes and why were ... By: damianpoirier. on 30 Nov 08, 07:47:59 yes and why were they fighting for it? (note if you reply with "they wanted the land" Then you get a big fat zero for your total lack of honesty) your vocabulary is ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 30 Nov 08, 07:46:13 your vocabulary is about as vast as your intellect. I bid you adieu. You're a reli-joke, ... By: sonykroket. on 30 Nov 08, 07:40:03 You're a reli-joke, bible-fucko. Why don't you take ... By: sonykroket. on 30 Nov 08, 07:39:06 Why don't you take that bible and shove it up your ass, bible-dipshit. Nobody goves a fuck about your silly little fairytale, dickhead. I think your little ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 30 Nov 08, 07:33:52 I think your little brain is pooped. I'll spare you of trying to think of a name. I'll give you points for trying. yes. It was holy ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 30 Nov 08, 07:33:11 yes. It was holy land. It can also be green land, dry land, wet land. LAND! Christians and Muslims wanted it for its holy value, just as the government today want the middle east for its oil value. Same principle. The big issue is Land, not God. It could've been ANY religions fighting for it, including atheists. the only vale of ... By: damianpoirier. on 30 Nov 08, 05:02:53 the only vale of the land to the cursaders because it was holy land you frakking idiot. They didn't travel and fight all the way from home for olives did they? ... By: sonykroket. on 29 Nov 08, 09:19:31 TheChristianDefender = preaching bible-muncher deluxe. well if I'm ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 29 Nov 08, 08:16:57 well if I'm bronze-age then you're bronze-age because we live in the same time period. I think mine was best, calling you sonycrotchlick. See, that was creative. Cussing doesn't make it more clever. Keep going and I'll let you know when it's a good one. no YOU are avoiding ... By: TheChristianDefender. on 29 Nov 08, 08:14:20 no YOU are avoiding the point. I know the war was a goddamn holy war. It was not a war over Gods, it was a war over land. That's the fact. Get it through your thick candy shell. I'm done with you, you loathsome curd.

Richard Dawkins on the origins of life (1 of 5) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 625 seconds Richard Dawkins at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Monday, August 11, 2008. The interview was conducted by Paula Kirby. Credit: http://richarddaw kins.net/ The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science (Many thanks to Douglas Bogie Gray and Mirage Television for filming the event!) Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: "He can't forgive ... By: Aaberg123. on 02 Dec 08, 00:54:59 "He can't forgive someone, unless justice is somehow satisfied." That's not forgiveness. That's retribution. "You can create any definition of evil that you want, but it doesn't make it so." Actually, I can. To take it in terms that we can relate to: Do you agree that giving birth to a child, knowing that you will send it into darkness and pain for all it's life, is evil. Yes or no? He could help us ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 01 Dec 08, 23:07:38 He could help us and has. It is our choice to accept it, He cannot force it on us. You can create any definition of evil that you want, but it doesn't make it so. The only thing that could make God evil is if He overlooked ANY sin on judgment day. He can't forgive someone, unless justice is somehow satisfied. We all have a ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 01 Dec 08, 23:05:47 We all have a conscience, which is the knowledge of right and wrong. We know when we do wrong. Killing itself is not wrong, it is unjust killing (murder) is wrong, because of the intention behind the action (unjust hatred, unjust anger). We are all responsible for our own actions, and since God is good He must give us what we deserve on Judgment Day. Religious people ... By: numbersyesno. on 29 Nov 08, 19:12:47 Religious people can be quite devious so you have to be careful when debating with them - this was demonstrated during Dawkins debate with Ben Stein and the latters decision to hijack and pervert Dawkins' words. But the judge ... By: megamarsvin. on 29 Nov 08, 18:50:19 But the judge didn't create us with the capacity and desire for crime to begin with. If a young child somewhere in Africa is raised to be a child soldier, is the child's fault that he ends up killing people? Or does the blame go to the people who raised him to do it? He said creationism ... By: chuck4842. on 29 Nov 08, 12:01:23 He said creationism was outlawed...LOL! I thought it was evolution was allowed. "He knew some of us ... By: Aaberg123. on 29 Nov 08, 09:54:10 "He knew some of us would go to hell and made us anyway. Yes, that's true. God does all things for His own glory, not for us." If you somehow knew your best friend would be in a car crash later that day, and had the power to stop it; wouldn't you try to intervene? If God is omnipotent and omniscient he COULD help us if he really wanted. But instead of helping his beloved children he'd rather hide in the ambiguous and let the majority of us burn in hell. By my definition, that is evil. Sir, wipe your chin ... By: jjdecani. on 29 Nov 08, 00:42:54 Sir, wipe your chin. The drool is threatening to soil your already rather regrettable shirt. He knew some of us ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 29 Nov 08, 00:31:07 He knew some of us would go to hell and made us anyway. Yes, that's true. God does all things for His own glory, not for us. We choose to sin or not, we deserve what we get if we go to hell. If God is good He can't just forgive people, justice has to be served. What would you think of a judge who just overlooked crime? Should a good judge be angry at something like murder/rape/theft...etc? Then follow this ... By: Aaberg123. on 28 Nov 08, 10:04:35 Then follow this logic please: God knows all. He wants everyone to go to heaven. Since he knows all, he knows who goes to heaven and who goes to hell. Despite knowing who of his so dearly beloved children goes to hell, he doesn't make an extra effort to save them. And since he knew our futures even before we were born, it is essentially means he MADE some of us for hell and some for heaven, being omnipotent and all. So you see, all the reasons you listed really doesn't matter. God is eternal/ ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 28 Nov 08, 06:26:53 God is eternal/infinite/everywhere and knows all things, just because He knows, doesn't mean He chooses. In God's perspective, He sees all time as a single moment. We can't put ourselves in His shoes and judge His actions when we are finite and temporal. People will end up in Hell because they broke God's law, so God is a good judge and will give them what they deserve. Lying, stealing, hatred, murder, lusting, adultery, idolatry, pride, are the reason people will go to hell. "Just because He ... By: Aaberg123. on 27 Nov 08, 11:39:54 "Just because He knows the future, does not mean He forced us to make that decision." DOES NOT COMPUTE, to say it bluntly. If he knows what we're going to choose long before we do, then in reality we have no say. This also means that he knows who goes to heaven or hell even before we are born. And this in the end means: People are born to suffer in hell, and there's nothing we can do to change it. Logical conclusion: God is the ultimate evil. Not the Devil, God! Yeah...God is good. Or not. "only islam is ... By: Aaberg123. on 27 Nov 08, 11:34:08 "only islam is right ! nobody else" By 'right', do you mean the only ultra fascist religion? Even though it sure takes the cake, the other religions aren't that far behind. fuck off their all ... By: JordoSkate101. on 24 Nov 08, 03:18:51 fuck off their all lies to control you. lol ... good 4 u By: badmashabhi. on 24 Nov 08, 01:50:00 lol ... good 4 u dawkins discussing ... By: badmashabhi. on 24 Nov 08, 01:48:45 dawkins discussing biology, chemistry and astrology. THIS IS HEAVEN ... :) .. oh the irony :P only islam is right ... By: samgee2007. on 23 Nov 08, 16:07:00 only islam is right ! nobody else I had to bring up ... By: consciousmess. on 22 Nov 08, 09:28:02 I had to bring up that point, because before addressing whether god exists or not, we must establish what god is. I purposely use lower case. If I say "I believe in 'unie'", you say "what is unie?" and I say "I dont know", there's nothing to debate about. Tell you what, can you define "God" and I will give you a response following this. I will watch in earnest!!! Thanks for ... By: jeclements. on 22 Nov 08, 08:14:01 Thanks for answering my cheeky question, the answer's irrelevant for this debate (it's only relevant for related debates). I've been thinking a lot about whether there is need for a cause of the universe (the crux of this debate) and what a satisfactory scientific answer would be. As an atheist, supernatural explanations are unsatisfactory to me. Hawking's theory is interesting, especially his flat earth analogy, although it's hard to fully understand. On Youtube: watch?v=nFjwXe-pXvM There is free will, ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 21 Nov 08, 20:56:59 There is free will, in the area of God allowing us to within His will. Just because He knows the future, does not mean He forced us to make that decision. What does this have to do with my questions and reasoning about the existence of God? Creating something else to disagree with isn't something you should be doing. Address the logic and questions about God's existence, please. ... By: consciousmess. on 21 Nov 08, 10:46:25 Iswhatyoubelievetrue, If you are a theist, you are implying that "God" interferes with the current workings of the universe. This is totally farcical and does not correspond to mankind being given free-will. Note this. If this omnipotent (all powerful), omniscient (all knowing) deity existed, man would not have free will. He wouldn't have free will as the world is always as HE decided, and this 'HE' knows that a man will perish in hell for eternity even before he is conceived!! I'm a theist. ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 20 Nov 08, 20:50:34 I'm a theist. Thank you for answering reasonably. You asked the question "what caused God?" by the below reasoning, since their is a need for an uncaused cause, it would necessarily be the cause of the universe, because the traits of the cause would be an infinite eternal intelligence and powerful being. Once you find an infinite cause, there is no need to find a first cause beyond it. The never ending cycle is infinite regression repackaged. //"There must be an ... By: Bob244DL. on 20 Nov 08, 15:09:09 //"There must be an initial cause"// Why? Because you say so? Give one example of something we can observe "beginning" to exist that would support your inference of the necessity of a cause. //"one that is necessarily uncaused"// So now you're saying that uncaused existence is possible? Is it or not? I understand the ... By: jeclements. on 20 Nov 08, 07:24:54 I understand the points you are making, and the questions are good ones. Unfortunately I'm not clever enough to know the answers. There is a theory that the universe does not need a first cause because it is in a neverending cycle of expansion and crunch. This does not seem a satisfactory answer to me, but I don't properly understand it. I do not know the cause of the universe or what it would need to be. But a god is also unsatisfactory - what caused god? BTW, are you deist or theist? I don't "conjure up ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 19 Nov 08, 21:33:13 I don't "conjure up" a god. Is there a need for a first cause? Is an infinite regression of causes possible? If there is a first cause, then we know it cannot be the universe itself. The universe is set and decays, meaning it once had a much higher order than it does now, indicating a beginning. We examine the effect to determine what the cause, specifically the first cause and cause of the universe. What would the cause need to like if it produced the universe?

Richard Dawkins on the origins of life (2 of 5) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 587 seconds Richard Dawkins at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Monday, August 11, 2008. The interview was conducted by Paula Kirby. Credit: http://richarddaw kins.net/ The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science (Many thanks to Douglas Bogie Gray and Mirage Television for filming the event!) Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: No, its a simple ... By: teamhex. on 27 Nov 08, 22:46:41 No, its a simple answer....3 letters long and nothing more, god is a concept. Your answer....just that....an answer. I never said God ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 25 Nov 08, 04:19:51 I never said God created himself and even if I did, that's no worse than the atheist saying the universe produced itself. What I DID say is that God has no beginning (possessing eternality) If our universe ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 25 Nov 08, 04:14:03 If our universe possessed eternality (having no beginning) then there would be no need for God. However, our universe cannot NOT have a beginning. If it had no beginning it would take forever (literally) to arrive at any specific point in time. Since it would take forever, it could never get there. This is also axiomatic. Again, you've yet ... By: NwZ2. on 24 Nov 08, 23:07:40 Again, you've yet to prove to me that 'God' always being is more true than the universe always being. I think it's more probable that we impose arbitrary limits on things beyond our understanding (ie beginning and end vs infinity). Why can this not be true of the unknown and 'God'? We don't know, but some are more humble in saying that than others. saying god has ... By: pastyfacial. on 24 Nov 08, 20:12:41 saying god has always been here answers absolutely nothing. if he has been here for ever he had waited an infinite amount of time to create everything. why? Sorry, but I dont ... By: Bundesnetzagent. on 24 Nov 08, 08:42:57 Sorry, but I dont agree. I never said God ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 23 Nov 08, 20:54:25 I never said God created himself. Again, something can't come from nothing therefore something simply always was...NOT created itself, just always was. Until there's evidence to the contrary, I call that 'something' God. You can call it whatever you want. I call it God because I think that's the most satisfactory answer we have at this point and I doubt it will ever change but almost certainly not in my life time. That's exactly what ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 23 Nov 08, 20:50:41 That's exactly what he said dear friend. He accused me of using a 'simple' answer when I said God created the universe. God is a short answer but far from simple. That's circular ... By: NwZ2. on 23 Nov 08, 18:46:50 That's circular reasoning: God created himself. This is something that can never be testable and therefore is not falsifiable. It's not science, it's conjecture. Evolution is a lie. ... By: Chemicalogic. on 21 Nov 08, 05:28:12 Evolution is a lie. ?? Really? Evolution has been accepted as fact. It has been documented that species change over time. Nothing is entirely static. And no, it is not axiomatic that universe was contrived by intelligence. There is no proof for this. Should a god exist, I very much doubt that you, or anybody else, would have even the faintest conception of what it is, or whether it satisfies some collection of conditions for which you think a "god" must submit. "...but it would ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 20 Nov 08, 00:49:18 "...but it would have had to evolve like everything else" Dawkins always says that. Evolution is a lie. It's axiomatic that the universe was contrived by intellegence and it's also axiomatic that complexity can ONLY arise from complexity. No, that is not ... By: Bundesnetzagent. on 19 Nov 08, 17:50:09 No, that is not what he said and you know that. You actually think ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 18 Nov 08, 03:46:14 You actually think that God is simpler than a 'primordial quantum vacuum fluction'?? Wierd. in as far as YOU ... By: frogsquirr3l. on 17 Nov 08, 12:32:23 in as far as YOU know! some physicists would say a primordial quantum vacuum fluctuation created the universe. i honestly dont know what that means, but unlike you i dont look for a simple answer and accept it. Well, he couldn't ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 17 Nov 08, 07:18:21 Well, he couldn't be God unless he always was. One of the intrinsic qualities associated w/ God is his eternality. Bottom line is that something CANNOT come from nothing. So, SOMETHING always existed. In as far as we know to this point, only a God can satisfy those conditions. Thinking outside ... By: Chemicalogic. on 16 Nov 08, 22:59:42 Thinking outside the box -or book (read: bible)? This is thinking outside the box. Shouldn't you be open to the idea of life elsewhere that may not have been created by some omniscient space god? The HE ALWAYS WAS is a bit of an easy way out, don't you think? Theist....my oh my. Dawkins is trapped ... By: friendlydiplomat. on 16 Nov 08, 06:57:45 Dawkins is trapped in a paradime of thinking that says everything alive happened by some form of evolution. Has this man EVER thought of 'thinking outside the Box'???! Ofcourse God couldn't have just happened! HE ALWAYS WAS. Thus, we call him God. Why do some people have such difficulty opening up to that (atleast just as a possibility)?? Dawkins....my oh my. Yeah that rarely ... By: looneyboy221133. on 15 Nov 08, 17:27:00 Yeah that rarely happens, but I guess there really are other intelligent mature people that surf youtube... lol Wow, people have ... By: Mesterse. on 15 Nov 08, 12:33:49 Wow, people have been having a civil and reasonable debate on youtube? I'm impressed. Kudos to you, sirs. I appreciate your ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 14 Nov 08, 23:10:43 I appreciate your time in the debate, you've been very courteous in our exchanges, and didn't go off on tangents or get angry. Thank you. Hopefully one of us will be proved wrong in the future :). But I hope neither of our pride will stop us from coming to the truth. It's very important to find the truth, and not just believe what we want to believe. The implications of God or no God are a big deal. I hope no one takes the question lightly. Using scientific ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 14 Nov 08, 23:07:04 Using scientific laws and logic, and starting with no presuppostion is where everyone should start when asking the questions "how did the universe began" or "is there a God?" When I mean transitional forms there should be a very slight gradation shown in the fossil record between the first cell and all living things. The fossil record shows complete kinds, all similar if not the same to kinds found today. I follow logic established from well established scientific laws, I don't assume anything I don't really get ... By: looneyboy221133. on 14 Nov 08, 12:57:21 I don't really get into to many healthy intelligent debates on youtube w/people arguing for a God... I must say you hold your ground pretty good, and you don't use childish attacks... I see we are at a pass where we aren't going to see eye to eye on this particular debate, but it was definitely fun "going at it" with you... Hopefully one of us will be proved wrong in our lifetimes... lol Creationist, very ... By: 8vian. on 14 Nov 08, 08:12:59 Creationist, very few people watching a Richard Dawkins debate are likely to be taken in by these tired, old and discredited arguments. You've clearly studied from evangelical web sites, not science textbooks. You know well enough that all living organisms are "true transitional forms", so why try to bait people here into explaining it to you yet again? If you could really "bury" evolution, you'd be hailed as the greatest scientist of our age, and not just some religious crank on youtube. My definition of ... By: iswhatyoubelievetrue. on 14 Nov 08, 04:32:08 My definition of God: A living, intelligent, eternal, infinite, being, as necessitated by the necessity of the being the ultimate cause of the universe. Law of Biogenesis, Cause and Effect, Probability, and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics are more than enough to bury evolution. Fossils? There is no genuine evidence of any true transitional form, only conclusions from scientists holding a tooth or chip of bone, with imaginations. Well if we follow ... By: looneyboy221133. on 14 Nov 08, 03:31:00 Well if we follow the chain of causation combined with the compilation of evidence supporting evolution, then we see that we came from less complex organisms and so forth and so on... all the way down to the simplest forms of matter... So the beginning cause wouldn't have to be Living or intelligent... Is this god you speak of associated with any theology here on earth? or are you using the term gods as something more grand and impersonal?

Creationist quote mine collapse Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 482 seconds Creationist quote mine collapse. http://en.wikiped ia.org/wiki/Quote_mi ning Credit: Atheist Experience http://www.atheist-e xperience.com 07/27/09 #563 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Lol Darwinist, I ... By: rba718. on 25 Nov 08, 20:38:33 Lol Darwinist, I laugh every time I hear that term. It's like Christians need to make a religion out of anything just so that they can feel like they can match up. i like the end ... By: sammygee17. on 23 Nov 08, 09:20:59 i like the end rationalization. Fucking priceless. ... By: DesiredControl107. on 21 Nov 08, 14:34:53 Fucking priceless. Hahaha. It's true! By: Shadyhunter04. on 17 Nov 08, 21:59:14 It's true! Biblical persons ... By: adevezar. on 16 Nov 08, 00:38:32 Biblical persons are obvious blind. They became what their master wnat to teel us to to be. But phylosophers don't go behind. That program is a joje. Bible persons are a koje like Horatio's are. @JesusIsMyBitch777 ... By: kmaiyssss. on 15 Nov 08, 11:40:25 @JesusIsMyBitch777 hehe love the name! woops! PHAIL By: torresmatt. on 14 Nov 08, 19:39:37 woops! PHAIL Typical creationist ... By: AlannahBabalon156. on 13 Nov 08, 18:44:06 Typical creationist. Trying to win an argument by utilising intellectual dishonesty. Pathetic. The point that Russell Glasser made about the paper he wrote regarding news and all the computations he made(pro and con) is honesty by showing the possibilities of both. Viva Glasser and Dillahunty! Winning a debate ... By: lowndessooner. on 11 Nov 08, 23:02:10 Winning a debate doesn't prove anything. It just proves more knowledge over something. Christians win debates over atheists doesn't mean Christianity is right. They win a debate and athey go all bonkers thinking they have proved God is real or something. Anyways... Nice one ^_^ By: JesusIsMyBitch777. on 10 Nov 08, 15:52:47 Nice one ^_^ As the Bible says ... By: t1er. on 09 Nov 08, 11:04:32 As the Bible says in Psalm 14:1: "..There is no god." And we all know that the Bible is infallible, right? :) haahaahaa moron!! By: DCLXVl. on 04 Nov 08, 08:42:23 haahaahaa moron!! Often when I hear ... By: pienipaha. on 02 Nov 08, 21:21:30 Often when I hear that quote, they've grabbed it from some website or other creotard source but they have no knowledge whatsoever of the quote's origin, other than it came from Darwin. Coz they like to ... By: pienipaha. on 02 Nov 08, 21:19:17 Coz they like to dance around the strawman. the only thing ... By: Maracachucho. on 02 Nov 08, 09:06:48 the only thing spontaneus in evolution is mutation. why do creationists insist that the WHOLE process is spontaneus? "A lie which is ... By: dechha1981. on 02 Nov 08, 06:59:15 "A lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies." - Alfred Lord Tennyson Also, how come he calls us "Darwinists" but he doesn't also call us Neutonists, Einsteinists, Edisonists, Writebrothersists, Bellists... I've said it before ... By: dechha1981. on 02 Nov 08, 06:38:24 I've said it before and I'll say it again; Anyone who quotes the Darwin Eye thing but leaves out the second half is either a complete blatant liar and should never ever be trusted whenever they say anything ever again, or they're just stupid. You're extremely ... By: down311matt. on 02 Nov 08, 01:31:47 You're extremely unimportant. No one is important. Were all animals, eating, crapping, drinking animals with no purpose whatsoever. You're a moron. ... By: down311matt. on 02 Nov 08, 01:29:52 You're a moron. Seriously. It doesn't take faith to believe in evolution because you don't need faith to believe in facts. Facts are true, they're evidence, they're real. What do you have, a single book? A piece of crap, nonsense from cover to cover with absolutely no proof that the people who are said to have written it even actually wrote it, ridiculous fairytale manual? If I told a judge I stoned a homosexual to death for being the way he is I'd either go to an asylum or get the chair. Moron! Me to By: Chill197. on 01 Nov 08, 12:57:03 Me to Im a Einsteinist ... By: syrett76. on 01 Nov 08, 00:41:59 Im a Einsteinist myself. Yeah, the caller ... By: GoblinXXX. on 31 Oct 08, 12:04:05 Yeah, the caller definatley made his point-- I assume his point was that he was a barely literate fool, who couldn't be troubled to read more than 3 lines in a book he was holding in his own hands. like it or not, ... By: Maracachucho. on 31 Oct 08, 05:34:53 like it or not, fanatism will lead people to do horrible things, since they pretty much stop caring about anything else. mmm i'd say you ... By: Maracachucho. on 31 Oct 08, 05:27:49 mmm i'd say you dont understand the problem about fanatism: if you're fanatical about solving the world hunger, its very likely that you do horrible things to anyone who gets in your way, as in "the ends justify the means". True enough... ... By: andymcgaha. on 31 Oct 08, 04:18:52 True enough... however that's pretty much the same thing. ;) If I'm fanatical about solving world hunger that's great good. If I'm fanatical about making sure no one lives past 29, that'd be great ill. Anyway it's all semantics I reckon.

PART II: NightLine Debate- Does God Exist? (1 of 5) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 548 seconds Does God exist? http://video.goog le.com/videoplay?doc id=63824367550661236 40&q=face+off+does+g od+exist+part+2 The original version of this clip can be found here. This video was uploaded onto YT in order to allow for commenting in a YT environment. No copyright infringement is intended. PART II: NightLine Debate- Does God Exist? (1 of 5) Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I don't know who ... By: chrisman737. on 01 Dec 08, 23:30:49 I don't know who the young lady is, but she did not answer the questions and her reasoning is sloppy. that is actually ... By: casperika. on 01 Dec 08, 12:28:17 that is actually beyond human understanding, because ur tiny mind can´t imagine smthng like that, God has crated evrything, and i bilieve it. scientist have an opinion that not everything can be proven by science, and neither u can, so how can u expect proving or just wondering who has crated God? God's God. By: UndeadLight. on 01 Dec 08, 11:15:24 God's God. so what created god ... By: paislor123. on 01 Dec 08, 04:56:20 so what created god then? THAT CHICK IS HOT. ... By: basicaustin. on 01 Dec 08, 04:26:48 THAT CHICK IS HOT. BTW THERE IS NO GOD. If you need to be ... By: conman2317. on 01 Dec 08, 00:08:09 If you need to be threatened with eternal damnation to act morally, who is the moral one???????????????????? I mean if it said in the bible you'd go ot heaven if you kill someone, would you do it???? look at those ... By: RegularGuy1003. on 30 Nov 08, 21:57:49 look at those titties Kirk takes it up the ass well, he has been ... By: cpearson32. on 30 Nov 08, 19:56:29 well, he has been on TV. maybe that's... how is kirk cameron ... By: kurosword. on 30 Nov 08, 11:49:42 how is kirk cameron qualified to do anything? especially this? You'd love to have ... By: VivekisV. on 30 Nov 08, 07:51:51 You'd love to have sex with her, wouldn't you you lustful animal you??? what's wrong? Are ... By: VivekisV. on 30 Nov 08, 07:44:52 what's wrong? Are you angry?? Doesn't it hurt to know that you're just being used??? ABIOGENESIS. Look it up you ignorant loser. people dont believe ... By: newproverbs. on 29 Nov 08, 21:52:12 people dont believe in the existence of god because they are idiots like you...wat do u think is there some thing that can ever create a living creature other than God..???? idiot no matter wat you do or how many billion years it take nothing can create a living creature other than God... kelly is hot hehehe ... By: newproverbs. on 29 Nov 08, 21:49:33 kelly is hot hehehe.. you could feel the ... By: beendanked. on 29 Nov 08, 12:48:06 you could feel the frustration and anger spewing out the mouths of the rrs. chill out. 6:50 "I think that ... By: VivekisV. on 28 Nov 08, 06:59:51 6:50 "I think that the #1 reason why people don't believe in the existence of god is because of evolution." -Kirk Cameron Well, he certainly showed his true motives in his vein attempt to debunk evolution. He wants all of us to believe in god because it's not enough that he himself is deluded, it would make him feel normal if everyone was as well. The #1 reason people don't believe in the existence of god is COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE not because they would rather believe something else. but it seems that ... By: 8data. on 28 Nov 08, 03:50:32 but it seems that all we want is more money or let greed go crazy or more war to entertain us but the science ... By: 8data. on 28 Nov 08, 03:49:04 but the science behind them came from the auspices of god thats the argument, anyways, have a good one! Last time I checked ... By: argetfalcon. on 28 Nov 08, 02:22:14 Last time I checked Bill Gates and James Watson were still alive. and what does it matter if the others are dead the point is they were atheists and they did good for the world. Like I said I can name more if you want, ones that are alive Kirk Cameron is ... By: hakara87. on 28 Nov 08, 01:18:56 Kirk Cameron is such a muppet. sorry for sexist ... By: 8data. on 28 Nov 08, 00:04:52 sorry for sexist comments, her voice is grating, but shes allright, couldve had done some extra prep work atheist women are ... By: 8data. on 28 Nov 08, 00:01:26 atheist women are hotter, good enough reason ray comfort them By: 8data. on 27 Nov 08, 23:56:51 ray comfort them bill gates taxen ... By: 8data. on 27 Nov 08, 23:54:14 bill gates taxen out by ballmer all dead, ... By: 8data. on 27 Nov 08, 23:52:46 all dead, argetfalcon if i have to choose ... By: 8data. on 27 Nov 08, 23:52:08 if i have to choose lady with breasts or kirk when saving them in a earthquake, hanging from a cliff, i will choose former

Do you believe in Australia? (2/2) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 418 seconds Matt Dillahunty and Russell Glasser explain how we can make conclusions about reality based on our limited senses. Credit: Atheist Experience http://www.atheis t-experience.com/ 01/07/07 #482 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: That was quite a ... By: harshm2u. on 01 Dec 08, 08:01:15 That was quite a funny argument. My heart pumps ... By: mathmexican4234. on 01 Dec 08, 07:48:25 My heart pumps blood too! :D Yes, but what we ... By: GoAtheism. on 29 Nov 08, 22:48:52 Yes, but what we want is proof that that belief is real. He accepted the belief, but that doesn't mean the belief had support, a belief is nothing more than a belief without support. :) these callers are ... By: marker853. on 29 Nov 08, 20:40:02 these callers are retarded LOL By: drayj14. on 27 Nov 08, 11:43:37 LOL "My heart pumps ... By: andytoz. on 26 Nov 08, 13:32:28 "My heart pumps blood" Thankyou! I'm so tired of christians talking about changing hearts. We don't think with our hearts! George Carlin did ... By: boumar19721972. on 26 Nov 08, 00:45:04 George Carlin did it in front of an audience and God didn't do a thing.Watch the following video: watch?v=casUr9UsabY it was a good joint ... By: captaiplanet52. on 25 Nov 08, 15:41:50 it was a good joint so god also wanted a smoke... unicorns do exist ... By: darkcellmp. on 24 Nov 08, 14:52:14 unicorns do exist fool! i met one and he told me god exists. thats how i know :) then we walked down the beach and talked about the meaning of life.....ahhh the good days, lol prove that any ... By: conman2317. on 23 Nov 08, 19:08:11 prove that any other religion isn't true, Prove that there isn't Unicorns, Prove that the Islam religion isn't true, prove that fairies don' t exist, I could go on forever, if you can't prove that something something doesn't exist doesn't make it true. Apply this to anything that your delusional mind can come up with. muuuuuuhhahahahahahahaahahaha, im an atheist and respect your opinions, your comment is just entertaining, lol. prove that a higher ... By: darkcellmp. on 22 Nov 08, 10:02:52 prove that a higher power doesnt exist. YOU CANT! mmuuuuhahahahahahaha. i'm christian and respect ur opinions, this stuff is just entertaining, lol. I agree with ... By: Brewhahh. on 21 Nov 08, 16:55:38 I agree with everything but that last part. The verse, as he sited says explain the belief, which he did, but not provide evidence that proves it. Good Chaps! By: UncleAntitheist. on 20 Nov 08, 04:27:41 Good Chaps! owned. By: DoughbeezyShorts. on 20 Nov 08, 02:54:55 owned. Last time I heard ... By: boumar19721972. on 20 Nov 08, 01:16:01 Last time I heard God it was after smoking a big joint.I don't think it was because of smoking that joint that I heard a voice.What do you think? If Christians were ... By: LifeIsABigPuzzle. on 19 Nov 08, 06:32:07 If Christians were doing miracles all of the time such as resurrecting dead people, healing severely disabled people, and blinding skeptics such as these guys, no other religion or philosophy would stand a chance. A Christian should just call in and say "I'm sorry to have to do this. But in the Name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth go blind until you acknowledge that Jesus is God." and then they actually did go blind, they would probably cancel the show. Especially if a whole bunch did it. we are animals but ... By: demonfox12344. on 18 Nov 08, 07:49:34 we are animals but we are so evolved and have accomplished so much as understanding that i dont beleive we should be classified as animals(much like how pluto doesnt fit the role as a planet)and i am an athiest they have a new ... By: demonfox12344. on 18 Nov 08, 07:47:04 they have a new machine sorta like a cat scan mixed with a lie detector that is 100%reliable and never fails "...you believe ... By: electronicbrainpan. on 18 Nov 08, 02:47:09 "...you believe australia's there based on faith..." lmfao how hilariously typical of a christian to twist words around like that Oh dear, gods ... By: CommaPatient. on 14 Nov 08, 18:38:03 Oh dear, gods started replying to his prayers... ...Oh and I just noticed that the RATINGS ARE AT EXACTLY 666!!!!!!! ok, ok I see what ... By: GodKillerAtheist. on 12 Nov 08, 06:08:59 ok, ok I see what you're saying. "you seem to want ... By: HouseofLo. on 12 Nov 08, 05:38:40 "you seem to want me to believe that a lie detector is always inaccurate you have yet to prove this." i didn't say that a lie detector aka polygraph is ALWAYS inaccurate, i literally said that it is UNRELIABLE. this means that sometimes it hits, sometimes it doesn't. if something is unreliable, you don't want to use it. sure you get hits sometimes, but sometimes you condemn innocent people too. My facts are sound, ... By: GodKillerAtheist. on 12 Nov 08, 05:36:21 My facts are sound, you seem to want me to believe that a lie detector is always inaccurate you have yet to prove this. I could care less if theist waste their life, its not my job to convert them to reality. I'm not a preacher nor do I wish to be one... my point is that ... By: HouseofLo. on 12 Nov 08, 03:55:05 my point is that they should not be used at all. just because something is commonly used, doesn't mean it works. ignorance is very common. reason i ask you to get your facts straight is because theists tend to jump on errors made by atheists. you can get a theist to almost wake up and smell the coffee, but as soon as you make one mistake he/she gets back on his/her knees and starts praying again, even more intensely than before. so why use them in ... By: GodKillerAtheist. on 11 Nov 08, 23:13:00 so why use them in the first place... you better get on the phone with a bunch of babies daddies that were on jerry springer and give them this information i'm sure they will love to not have to pay child support right about now LOL

Christopher Hitchens on Books & Ideas (1 of 3) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 513 seconds Christopher Hitchens sits down with PlumTV's Jage Toba for a casual half-hour interview. Hitchens speaks on a variety of topics ranging from religion and politics to Monty Python and Orwell. Credit: PlumTV http://www.plumtv .com/ Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Keep telling ... By: flamablesteve. on 29 Nov 08, 09:21:13 Keep telling yourself that. Lack of belief. The ... By: miket1m. on 29 Nov 08, 04:47:54 Lack of belief. The lack of belief defense of atheists is not logical. It ignores the reality that people categorize concepts anywhere in the range of total acceptance to total rejection. It is our nature to do this. We don't do nothing with information. Lots of religions ... By: NwZ2. on 28 Nov 08, 17:38:58 Lots of religions have "fulfilled" prophecies. Saying "Yours is worse than mine" or saying "yours are wrong and mine are right" don't count. Try again. When you can tell us why you disbelieve those religions and believe yours, you'll understand why we don't believe in yours as well. BTw you cannot prove nor disprove things of a supernatural nature. You're also wrong on that point. "Atheism" isn't something to be "true" about. It's a lack of belief. Your ignorance is stifling. great video. sweet ... By: lesscunning. on 08 Nov 08, 19:11:19 great video. sweet ray bans. thank you jesus for christopher hitchens... Precisely. ... By: Hottides. on 08 Nov 08, 10:13:29 Precisely. Progressive politics and religious moderation have mainly advanced by marginalizing and effectively muting and disenfranchising rigid literalists and extremists, as opposed to physically destroying them. As Sam Harris has essentially stated, Atheism too will thus progress, as the untested propositions and ignorant superstitions defended by religionists are rendered unpalatable and banished to the periphery of conversation and thought through education and rational persuasion. There is evidences ... By: miket1m. on 07 Nov 08, 04:50:30 There is evidences for God's existence such as fulfilled biblical prophecy, Jesus' resurrection, the Transcendental Argument, the entropy problem, etc. But there is another problem for atheists. Refuting evidences for Gods existence does not prove atheism true anymore than refuting an eyewitness testimony of a marriage denies the reality of the marriage. There is no proof whatsoever to support atheism and the position is far from logical. First, dunno who ... By: AvangionQ. on 07 Nov 08, 04:22:09 First, dunno who marked this as spam -- its not. Second, I think you have your terms mixed up -- atheist just means a lack of belief in any deity or supernatural cause. I'd posit that there is no god because there is no statistically significant evidence, no proof to support the claim that there is a god, and without such I have no need for belief in what cannot be proven. There are millions of similar things I can just as equally discount. Hence, I am an atheist. "and how they've ... By: PiroNiro. on 07 Nov 08, 04:11:37 "and how they've been taken over by Christian Evangelicals" If they want to inject their beliefs into public policy... we need to marginalize these people, just like the creationists. "People are just ... By: AvangionQ. on 07 Nov 08, 04:08:00 "People are just generally fed up with being lectured by clerical bullies - I've had enough of it" - Christopher Hitches ... yeah, that about sums up my viewpoint on what's happened to the Republican party, and how they've been taken over by Christian Evangelicals -- no longer the party of small government, constitution and states rights, and I'm glad the elections bear out this point ... 'mother teresa was ... By: fishypaw. on 17 Oct 08, 12:53:43 'mother teresa was a douche bag' lol, go Chris The problem becomes ... By: toecutterr6. on 07 Oct 08, 16:34:04 The problem becomes that people want to marginalize your existance into a category..any category.If you're an atheist well then people like Al Sharpton will identify you with whatever negative connotation exists about being an atheist,(He states,"atheists of the world have killed and hurt people too,they're not absolved of guilt").I refuse to be judged in any 'ist' or 'ism' category,if it doesn't make sense for a fiddler crab or a hawk then it doesn't make sense for me as well. I don't see the ... By: foreveringreen. on 07 Oct 08, 06:17:33 I don't see the problem in being called a word that's definition is a "denier of something's existence" when that something doesn't exist. It's almost a compliment to be called a name that means "disbeliever", when what you disbelieve isn't real. You're arguing that you prefer to be called the equivilent of, "a denier of a thing's existence in which the thing does not exist", but that's so redundant it's unnecessary. Because there isn't ... By: toecutterr6. on 07 Oct 08, 02:41:32 Because there isn't a god to NOT believe in.I would be called...whatever a person living in a B.C. world would be called.You see they haven't had the knowledge of a god yet. you wouldnt call ... By: foreveringreen. on 07 Oct 08, 01:56:17 you wouldnt call youself an atheist, why? the definition of atheist is a person who disbelievesthe existance god. if you disbelieve in god your an atheist. you may not call yourself one but you are. but I may see what you're saying. the word atheist has a negative connotation, as a opposed to "a person who denies the existance of god", so you may not want to associate. i could be totally off, so tell me. and for the record, an anti-arborial linguist would be a linguist who is against trees. I think it's a ... By: toecutterr6. on 04 Oct 08, 03:33:20 I think it's a semantical arguement.I don't believe there is a god but I'm not an atheist.I also don't believe in talking trees but would you call me an anti-arborial linguist? The way he smokes ... By: lombakazi. on 01 Oct 08, 05:37:21 The way he smokes is really cool No. You can't prove ... By: foreveringreen. on 01 Oct 08, 04:01:27 No. You can't prove that their aren't lephrachauns, but you can definitely say you don't believe in them. The thing that gets ... By: o0o0oDANTEo0o0o. on 30 Sep 08, 00:03:55 The thing that gets me... Hitchens admits here (as he has elsewhere) that he will stop short of stating that there is no God, because he can't prove the position (which is quite right). However, doesn't this make him more agnostic than atheist? Of all the ... By: humanman65. on 28 Sep 08, 11:30:03 Of all the fruitless searches... Mystery in life is not equal to the discoveries made on behalf of the history of survival within the narrow band on this planet that humans have actually existed. Mystery is not a necessity of survival. Praying to know accomplishes nothing, knowing how to learn accomplishes knowing. How frigg'n heady is that! :-) Actually, I was ... By: AllySmells001. on 26 Sep 08, 04:25:50 Actually, I was thinking the same thing. Cigarettes should be legal, as long as we disallow nicotine from being put in them. Is it right to lace Doritoes w/ Nicotine? No! The comments we ... By: tyendanega. on 20 Sep 08, 12:55:27 The comments we post are read by ALL of the people who watch this video, not just you, or PiroNiro. My comments were meant to be slightly funny....it seems to you, they weren't even slightly funny, and in your case, I apologize! "Mr Hitchins" Do ... By: sy1234. on 20 Sep 08, 10:50:45 "Mr Hitchins" Do you realize that your message is being sent to PiroNiro, the owner of this channel, and NOT the subjects in the video? Mr Hitchins: Please ... By: tyendanega. on 19 Sep 08, 17:32:14 Mr Hitchins: Please consider quitting smoking! Seriously! It pains me to see you sucking on those cancer sticks! We need your intellectual input for as long as possible! I wish she'd go for ... By: screwoffreg. on 19 Sep 08, 07:37:57 I wish she'd go for an average joe like me. She is so beautiful. Stalin did not kill ... By: nima90. on 19 Sep 08, 02:37:10 Stalin did not kill from an "atheistic perspective" how did you figure that? atheism is relative not necessary for communism. Also where did you get 60 million (funny you even wrote conservatively) according to most evidence (and most is anecdotal) its around 30 million.

Response to: *WHO* created the universe? Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 356 seconds Matt Dillihunty and Russell Glasser respond to the question "who created the universe"? Credit: Atheist Experience http://www.atheis t-experience.com/ 01/07/07 #482 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: It's more like a ... By: BlizBob. on 29 Nov 08, 02:02:07 It's more like a reflex action than attempt to explain. But this has one effect on these "creatards". They usually don't reply. Not to me atleast. Evolved apes trying to teach a little science to god's creations... hilarious. Earth revolves ... By: pandstar. on 29 Nov 08, 01:08:19 Earth revolves around the sun. That's a fact. Earth revolves around the sun because of gravity. That's a theory. ---- Ah yes! The never ending attempts to explain the definition of theory to creatards Good luck and fight the good fight! Earth revolves ... By: BlizBob. on 28 Nov 08, 21:29:06 Earth revolves around the sun. That's a fact. Earth revolves around the sun because of gravity. That's a theory. Fire burns. That's a fact. Fire is reaction where oxygen fuses with carbon when certain temperature is reached. That's a theory. Lifeforms change over time. That's a fact. Lifeforms change over time due to mutations and (not random) natural selection and eventually new species are born. That's a theory of evolution. Fact is a fact. Theory is an explanation to the fact. Give me a reason to ... By: yarow122. on 28 Nov 08, 21:23:31 Give me a reason to believe that. aha, so you , made ... By: Bogzy1989. on 28 Nov 08, 13:50:08 aha, so you , made in the laboratory 'something' out of 'nothing'? WOW, I'd like to see that. in the area of ... By: amet1980. on 28 Nov 08, 12:41:02 in the area of quntum physics which bottom line we reffer to energy, something can be spondenusly created temprorarily and the vanish with out any trace , returning to the balance held before a perfect 0. 0-something -0 "something can come ... By: Bogzy1989. on 28 Nov 08, 04:44:34 "something can come of nothing." that is illogical and impossible.how can it be "proven"? brilliant points ... By: yanDjay. on 27 Nov 08, 23:41:05 brilliant points made by you guys unless they collide. By: amet1980. on 24 Nov 08, 18:27:47 unless they collide. unless they collide ... By: amet1980. on 24 Nov 08, 18:26:15 unless they collide , then different rotation can created. take a look on the moon surface to get you answer. explained by science . next. matter=energy ... By: amet1980. on 24 Nov 08, 18:13:15 matter=energy something can come of nothing. in fact is proven laboratory. 70% of the univerce is negative energy/matter dark. univerce may well have 0 sum . perfect equation. hear saying ;no ... By: amet1980. on 24 Nov 08, 18:09:04 hear saying ;no evidence.. i contest that ;i know that Jesus and Mohamed are sucking each other in the temple mountain.. has the exact same validity as your preaching. I'm not trying to ... By: damianpoirier. on 24 Nov 08, 06:46:51 I'm not trying to disprove god. You did not bring ... By: mouzouki. on 24 Nov 08, 05:34:29 You did not bring any arguements to the table to back up what you are claiming. By telling me that I need to get real education does not support anything you say. God exists and everytime you are trying to disprove Him you WILL always fail. God exists everywhere, even within you. "it's crazy to ... By: pandstar. on 24 Nov 08, 00:59:04 "it's crazy to think that anyone alive today can prove how the universe began. the thought that all life came from some goo that eventually became my great grandma takes just as much faith to believe as creationism" Well of course if that load of crap is what you think evolution, abiogenesis or the big bang claims, then yeah, that would take a lot of faith Lucky for us scientists claim no such nonsense and have mountains of real evidence to back up their claims Try reading a real science book " So therefore, all ... By: damianpoirier. on 24 Nov 08, 00:37:45 " So therefore, all of the planets should be spinning in the same direction. " facepalms - how about you get a real education instead of listening to bible munching idiots? "Also, in an ... By: damianpoirier. on 24 Nov 08, 00:36:19 "Also, in an environment without friction you would have this spinning dot going so fast it would then explode." Again it's only hovind reading about nebula formation that gets it wrong(like so much he gets wrong) and thinks the BB was a spinning dot. No one else (except creationists) thinks it was a dot or that it was spinning. Your strawman argument fails to measure up to reality. Try again this time don't bring your fiction to the debate. "And the theory ... By: damianpoirier. on 24 Nov 08, 00:31:15 "And the theory itself still does not answer many important questions - Such as where did all the matter in the universe come from?" i don't know does not default to "god did it". sweeping your questions under a griant rug and labeling it god doesn't actually answer those questions. "Here is how the ... By: damianpoirier. on 24 Nov 08, 00:29:21 "Here is how the Big Bang is often presented:" Only by idiot fucktards like kent hovind. Sounds like you've been listening to too much of his nonsense. This matter which ... By: mouzouki. on 24 Nov 08, 00:20:28 This matter which is said to have created the planets would all need to spin in the same direction as the object it came from. So therefore, all of the planets should be spinning in the same direction. However two of them are not. Venus and Uranus spin backwards. Some planets even have moons that not only spin backwards, but travel backward around their planets. Also, in an ... By: mouzouki. on 24 Nov 08, 00:19:24 Also, in an environment without friction you would have this spinning dot going so fast it would then explode. If this happened, then all of the particles and matter being expelled from this "spinning dot" would all have to spin in the same direction as the dot they exploded from. This is a known law of science, which those who believe in Evolution cannot do away with. It is known as the Conservation of angular momentum. There are many ... By: mouzouki. on 24 Nov 08, 00:17:41 There are many problems with this theory. And the theory itself still does not answer many important questions - Such as where did all the matter in the universe come from? If all the matter in the universe was compressed into a small dot, what caused this to happen? Where did gravity come from that held it together? If this "dot" spun rapidly until it exploded., then where did the energy come from to start the spinning? Here is how the Big ... By: mouzouki. on 24 Nov 08, 00:16:05 Here is how the Big Bang is often presented: Somewhere between 18 and 20 billion years ago, all of the matter in the universe was compressed into a tiny space no larger than the dot on a page. This dot spun faster and faster until it exploded, thus creating the Universe and everything in it. BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "if evolution is ... By: damianpoirier. on 24 Nov 08, 00:03:59 "if evolution is true then there is no value on human life what so ever" Imagine that your god doesn't exist. Would you suddenly not care for your family or friends? Would you suddenly have no motivation to pursue a career or develop skills? Would you suddenly lose all interest in all of life's pleasures? evolution and ... By: twinkleestrellita. on 23 Nov 08, 23:45:58 evolution and creation cannot be proven. it's crazy to think that anyone alive today can prove how the universe began. the thought that all life came from some goo that eventually became my great grandma takes just as much faith to believe as creationism. i chose to believe the biblical account, because if evolution is true then there is no value on human life what so ever. we're all just here by accident and no one is unique or special and no ones life really matters.

Religion, Politics and the End of the World (1/9)-Sam Harris Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 657 seconds Sam Harris and Chris Hedges engage in a debate over the role that religion and politics play in Islamic extremism. Credit: Truthdig http://www.truthd ig.com/ http://creativeco mmons.org/licenses/b y-nc-nd/2.5/ Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: love his books By: renofury. on 01 Dec 08, 16:01:45 love his books When? Who proved it? By: astat1. on 29 Nov 08, 14:30:24 When? Who proved it? the first 6 minutes ... By: officespace672. on 29 Nov 08, 07:33:01 the first 6 minutes of this video are worthless intros this was proven ... By: officespace672. on 29 Nov 08, 07:29:56 this was proven using math What do you mean? By: astat1. on 25 Nov 08, 21:38:26 What do you mean? The Ark was ... By: astat1. on 25 Nov 08, 21:37:51 The Ark was actually a space craft. So much for freedom ... By: resa72359. on 20 Nov 08, 16:48:28 So much for freedom of speech and religion. Excuse Sam for his ... By: Goldenbindu. on 20 Nov 08, 01:38:06 Excuse Sam for his blatant ignorance on 9/11. The unfortunate truth is that, on some level, Sam has convinced himself that 9/11 needs to be literally true, just as the media gave it to us, for his arguments on atheism to be absorbed. It's apparently an attention getting device for his subsequent discussions on the radical and immanent danger of Islam. But, please, do the math: two planes brought down three buildings. Please, Sam, stop repeating blatant lies. We expect more of you on this topic. Lets narrow them ... By: dkelley07. on 09 Nov 08, 02:35:00 Lets narrow them down to only being able to say "Well, it may be contrary to rational thought, but it's just something I believe." That's progress, I think. We can't cop out ... By: dkelley07. on 09 Nov 08, 02:29:06 We can't cop out and say they're "drooling halfwits". In stead, lets tell them that Israeli archiologists are coming to prove that Moses and his people traveling through the desert to Mt. Sinia is historically (and logically) impossible. Lets tell them they have no business claiming the story of Noah's Ark is plausible. Lets GIVE them the evidence. Sam Harris makes a ... By: dkelley07. on 09 Nov 08, 02:24:50 Sam Harris makes a great point in this sense. People (religious fundamentalists) need to be confronted on such points if they claim their beliefs have ANY scientific integrity. Even if they ARE unsavably delusional, the conversation NEEDS to be had. Personally, I can't ... By: dkelley07. on 09 Nov 08, 02:22:32 Personally, I can't believe we are discussing the legitimacy of the "Ark Story" in any contemporary sense. But we are. And I think that is important. Why are you talking ... By: cruelfate45. on 06 Nov 08, 00:12:17 Why are you talking about stories in a collection of old booklets? What does that have to do with here and now? What amazes me ... By: wilsparky. on 28 Oct 08, 16:41:09 What amazes me about religious people is that they really are as stupid as they seem. Unashamedly idiotic. Like the drooling halfwit who believes he is clever because he finds he can state nonesense and get away with it. Abrahamic religions are false, nonsense and very dangerous. Okay Ark-idiots, to ... By: hemotomaniac77. on 24 Oct 08, 14:47:43 Okay Ark-idiots, to simplify this as much as HUMANLY possible: You cannot fit two of all the animals on a wooden boat plus food. Unless God has a friggin' shrink ray. Just for once try and use logic. You could not fit all the insects on it! It was about five ... By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 24 Oct 08, 08:44:42 It was about five months that they were in the Ark. In 40 days and 40 ... By: flankspeed. on 22 Oct 08, 02:00:18 In 40 days and 40 nights? Maybe more insects. But I'm surprised the bigger ones weren't eating each other... !! I LOVE GETTING ... By: mamamelucos. on 16 Oct 08, 14:15:56 !! I LOVE GETTING on the CAM!! msn!!! msg me jane23belle e g you can meet ... By: 1candideov. on 15 Oct 08, 08:20:54 g you can meet local girls like me on my page Y You are talking out ... By: sonykroket. on 14 Oct 08, 14:41:54 You are talking out of your reli-ass. There have been ... By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 14 Oct 08, 02:00:26 There have been many objects in recent history that have been found fossilized. The gazelles are not the only things that the lions (cats) could eat. That is the mystery ... By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 14 Oct 08, 01:51:43 That is the mystery why water would appear to be heavier than the land but that is what we see. The shoreline area seems to have something to do with increasing the pressure and there are clearly factors that we don't know about yet. Fossilization ... By: JaMoond. on 14 Oct 08, 01:49:36 Fossilization involves exchange of organic material with surrounding mineral? It doesn't happen over 4000 years. There is a threshold value at which prey population must sustain in order for predators to survive. If you have 2 lions, and it roamed around with 2 gazelles, the gazelles would have been wiped out (lions subsequently). How could somebody as old as you be as naive as a child. This conversation is over because the more I speak the stupider you seem to get. You need education Who said that ... By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 14 Oct 08, 01:44:05 Who said that fossilization has to accelerate? The animals were buried and compressed. Many fossils are noticeably flattened. That's all it takes. Animals have many offspring. There were likely many more animals that came off the ark than what entered the ark. Actually, the water ... By: JaMoond. on 14 Oct 08, 01:37:10 Actually, the water merely accumulates lower area first. Land mass is heavier than water by volume, so by your definition, the crust would sink everywhere. Whatever water (8 Km) is not comparable to crust (40 km average). Water amounts to insignificant effect compared to the flowing larva underneath the crust. Indian ocean is smaller than pacific, yet it has bigger mountain ranges than anywhere in the world.

Christopher Hitchens on Books & Ideas (2 of 3) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 639 seconds Christopher Hitchens sits down with PlumTV's Jage Toba for a casual half-hour interview. Hitchens speaks on a variety of topics ranging from religion and politics to Monty Python and Orwell. Credit: PlumTV http://www.plumtv .com/ Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: He revises U.S. ... By: procommenter. on 25 Nov 08, 21:26:35 He revises U.S. history to promote himself. As the world ... By: mongobobo. on 16 Nov 08, 19:02:08 As the world becomes more obviously secular, the theocrats have become more vicious as they see their grip slipping. I like the Hitch, ... By: thesethreekings. on 10 Nov 08, 18:46:08 I like the Hitch, but he does spin alot of information if it helps the point he's trying to make. Which is fair enough if you wanna get paid to appear on networks. For example, he spoke about Mother Theresa and her last-minute athiestic turnabout in quite a touching way, but then will call her a douchbag here. He's also castigated people for offending religions in order to make a seperate point, although quite happily does it himself. I like Hitch but you can't take him literally too much. his khaki suit & ... By: lesscunning. on 08 Nov 08, 19:20:01 his khaki suit & green dress shirt look really nice. This dude is ... By: nmr4991. on 18 Oct 08, 02:56:04 This dude is amazing. His arguments are always rock solid. I think that is ... By: Maverician. on 15 Oct 08, 01:41:35 I think that is even the same video I am talking about, that however does not mean that he dislikes her, it could be showing his distaste for what she's been put through. I'm not definitely saying that he doesn't dislike her, just that I don't think people should judge his view to be that automatically, just cause they see him as a contrarian. I remember a video ... By: toecutterr6. on 14 Oct 08, 14:42:16 I remember a video of Hitchens being asked about the time he actually met Lady Di and he,(rather callously),said she looked like an anorexic scarecrow. From what I know, ... By: Maverician. on 14 Oct 08, 13:13:49 From what I know, he doesn't have a problem with her, infact he sympathises, he just thought the whole big thing about her death was way over the top. On top of that it was something that ultimately was caused by the horrid incestual monarchy that is the Royal family. There is a vid on youtube about it if you can be bothered searching. mother theresa was ... By: iouakick. on 07 Oct 08, 16:02:40 mother theresa was hailed as a saint, she took money from people under false pretences to put to use in her "houses of the dying"(which in themselves were supposed hospices for people to die in peace, although no drugs were supplied to ease their passing nor were their surroundings comfortable) associated and condoned poeple that brought terror to the countries they ruled, and used the money given to her to spread her nunneries around the world, i dont have space, watch "hells angel" on utube:) What are Hitchens' ... By: toecutterr6. on 04 Oct 08, 03:47:05 What are Hitchens' views on Lady Di?? I don't understand why he was happy that she died? there may very well be a reason for it but I am ignorant of it. He really hates ... By: ezmorningrebel. on 02 Oct 08, 09:30:32 He really hates Mother Theresa, doesn't he? What exactly made her so despicable? i see him as such a ... By: dorkydevil. on 01 Oct 08, 08:56:37 i see him as such a bad ass vigilante, like the batman of atheism He always hits it. ... By: jacobssandy. on 22 Aug 08, 02:02:03 He always hits it. The only reason religion can exist is because people are afraid of dying. Man if everyone could just get off that wagon and see that secular ethics is even stronger than religious ones, the world really, really could be a much more wonderful place. But, people are so self-centred that their own insecurities will dictate their course of action over what is the best for everyone no matter what. But hopefully we can start a slow path towards this. The church uses ... By: diebauma. on 21 Aug 08, 08:57:19 The church uses their knowledge of human fear and manipulation in order to get their incredible income and not pay any taxes. Hitchens uses his knowledge in order to educate people on the truth while at the same time making money. There's such a big contrast between both that I don't even know how you could even laugh about it. Have you ever looked at the word 'Hypocrite' on a dictionary?, I'm quite sure you'll find it very self-defining. @FrenziedLogic ... By: PacalB. on 17 Aug 08, 12:37:39 @FrenziedLogic Africa and whats left of African culture is a very good modern day example of just this. It really does sicken me to see African peoples perverted by this religious junk, both Islam and Christianity are guilty of this. Ask an African, "what of your peoples history & culture, what of your beliefs that existed for thousands of years before Christianity & Islam? ", mostly they just look at u & shrug their shoulders repeating the same old dogma drilled into them, all very very sad. Exactly, ... By: qzchris. on 17 Aug 08, 10:39:05 Exactly, sumfamousperson17. Tell me about it, ... By: JACKtheRIPP3R189. on 13 Aug 08, 04:58:13 Tell me about it, it was Hitchens critique of the creepy old spinster that turned me on to his work. Knowing some rather "spooky" catholics myself i can understand. They have a morbid obsession with death, suffering, and poverty, mother teresa took the people dying outside and brought them inside to die. Then she went to poor uneducated countries (as catholics often do) and told them to have more children and dont use condoms, how responsible. There's nothing ... By: sumfamousperson17. on 03 Aug 08, 06:44:52 There's nothing wrong with making money. C Hitchens & R ... By: fightintheshade. on 02 Aug 08, 00:59:33 C Hitchens & R Dawkins the best thing to happen for Christianity in 100's of years. Keep it up boys! Maybe we'll take up a collection for ya. Hold on...maybe you could kick back some of your "God money" from the books etc Its douchebag ... By: Gringoman911. on 20 Jul 08, 05:16:35 Its douchebag journalists that cooked up the sham hoax that became the cult of mother Theresa. "What can be ... By: TheOats. on 11 Jul 08, 15:01:36 "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" -Christopher Hitchens The so called ... By: FrenziedLogic. on 09 Jul 08, 16:00:47 The so called christian "charity" worker's are only using the poor, illiterate and impoverished to spread their faith across the world. It has nothing to do with helping people. Their just trying to destroy the diversity of cultures, with their vast wealth. It's no suprise ... By: steerpike66. on 26 Jun 08, 11:56:57 It's no suprise that people slide into soft religiosity; there is virtually nothing instilled in us at school that would allow to to resist it. Science is on the slide; we never teach our children philosophy (children are the only people for whom a course in comparative philosophy might be really useful). Twenty years of science, language and rational debate training and the worst excesses of religious belief would simply disappear. At all times, we should be capable of self-analysis. If only these ... By: BrimStone1st. on 11 Jun 08, 09:16:14 If only these people would realize that having bowed down to ANY authority out of fear of pain, death or dismemberment; Is not ACTUALLY bowing down to ANYTHING but fear, itself. You were forced to so so, rather than that authority proving its deservedness of ANY respect by its good works. Stand yourselves back up, reclaim your own hearts and minds and stop worrying yourself sick about any other soul but your OWN. He's right. That is ... By: PurushaDesa. on 09 Jun 08, 12:11:05 He's right. That is the most destructive part of religion the internal mechanism that says it's not enough that I believe this, but I say you will undoubtedly benefit when you believe it too. Like Dawkins says, it's a virus that starts from childhood - and they know the earlier they get you, the harder it is to shake off.

"I'm an atheist, BUT . . ." by Richard Dawkins (1 of 6) Posted by: PiroNiro Video duration: 600 seconds Richard Dawkins replies to criticism to his book "The God Delusion". Credit: RichardDawkins.ne t http://richarddaw kins.net/print.php?i d=318 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Can someone tell me ... By: Dmasterman. on 01 Dec 08, 07:44:42 Can someone tell me what the "BUT" leads to? Of which you can ... By: SayNoToIslamofascism. on 27 Nov 08, 16:38:25 Of which you can provide no evidence either exists, therefore you not only prove religion works on irrationa and immoral fear, but also that your fear is irrational and clearly shows you are illogical, brainwashed and unable to think critically. As if a god gives a fuck who worships it. If something is so desperate for worship, then it's vindictive and not worth worshipping. I told you to worship me, you tell me to fuck off. So preach elsewhere. PS: Heaven and hell really don't exist. Hi mars Thank you ... By: mscarolinadarlin. on 27 Nov 08, 01:39:45 Hi mars Thank you so much for setting it straight for me, it's just that i have been told that quote for almost all my life maybe my family thought it sounded better than the real one. Peace Teri (~_~) mscarolinadarlin, ... By: marsCubed. on 26 Nov 08, 17:44:58 mscarolinadarlin, that is a misquote, you are referring to Milton's Paradise Lost. "It is better to rule in rule in hell than to serve in heaven" You are in fact quoting Satan, thought you might like to know that. You may also discover that this was very much a Protestant ideal, Milton is very much on Satan's side in the book. It was part of the puritan paradigm, breaking God's rule to live as protestants without the miracles or jealous god's magic tricks and cheating. We were all born as ... By: marsCubed. on 26 Nov 08, 17:38:32 We were all born as atheists BUT.. then some bastard born again creep tried to abuse us with utter fiction, BullShit, guilt and fear. Blasphemy is a ... By: acronus. on 26 Nov 08, 04:02:23 Blasphemy is a victimless crime. I think I might get that tattooed on me somewhere. Just wanted to say ... By: speider. on 26 Nov 08, 03:42:42 Just wanted to say that your response was rational, but i'm curious to your first post. Do you believe that those who do not believe will go to hell? I think you'll find ... By: phocjame. on 23 Nov 08, 14:23:11 I think you'll find it's better to forego both of them and have a party on earth. Translation: Its ... By: WiPTornado. on 16 Nov 08, 18:32:52 Translation: Its better to be a dick on----- WRONG! having unreasonable ... By: dreadpiratedan. on 16 Nov 08, 05:04:47 having unreasonable criticism of anyone's work is unacceptable. he's simply responding to those unreasonable criticisms. it's hard to not ... By: vwcops. on 13 Nov 08, 06:58:44 it's hard to not imagine foam coming out of